[tmd]

Not sure what to make of this except to say it asks some interesting questions, not sure it answers that many, it seems to take an answer and try to make the quesiotn fit.

My biggest issue is these two paragraphs seem to clash for me:

1) My glandular response to intimidation is not to be afraid but to get angry. And it is reported by several friends that I’m pretty scary when I get angry, though I’ve never actually gone off on anyone as an adult.

2) I don’t experience physical fear very strongly even in many situations where rationally speaking I probably should. In particular, I have little or no fear of hand-to-hand combat.

This person gets angry when intimidated but has never 'gone off' on any body as an adult and yet has experienced hand to hand combat? Am I missing something?